Legal & Technical Infrastructure

Anchored in the official architecture of nine international frameworks.

Not aligned with them. Not inspired by them. Anchored in them — through formal registration as a Europass issuer, ESCO taxonomy mapping, EQF level correspondence, eIDAS 2.0 compliant electronic sealing, EBSI blockchain verification, WEF Future of Jobs alignment, UNESCO transversal competency concordance, and 1EdTech Open Badges 3.0 certification.

Europass
Registered Issuer
EBSI
Blockchain Verification
eIDAS 2.0
Electronic Seal
ESCO v1.2.1
Taxonomy Mapping
EQF 1–8
Level Correspondence
WEF
Future of Jobs · Aligned
UNESCO
Competências transversais
1EdTech
Open Badges 3.0
ISO 27001
Security
GDPR
Proteção de Dados
The Core Argument

Most certifications are issued by the same institution that delivers the training. EASEC is not.

This distinction is foundational — and it is the first thing a quality assurance reviewer or procurement officer should ask of any certification they evaluate.

When a university, training provider or employer issues a certificate for learning that they themselves delivered, the issuer and the evaluator are the same entity. The credential reflects the institution's own judgment about the quality of its own programme. That is not independent assessment. It is self-attestation — valuable within its context, but not independently verifiable, not internationally comparable, and not auditable by a third party.

EASEC operates on an entirely different principle. EASEC does not deliver training. EASEC does not design curricula. EASEC does not have a commercial interest in any learning programme it evaluates. EASEC's sole function is independent psychometric assessment and credential issuance — conducted under EU-recognised frameworks, secured with official digital infrastructure, and verifiable by any employer, institution or public authority in the world.

That independence is not a marketing claim. It is the structural foundation of why the credential has value — and why it holds up under the scrutiny that self-issued credentials cannot.

What EASEC does not do

EASEC does not deliver training. Does not design curricula. Has no commercial interest in any learning programme it evaluates. The conflict of interest that structurally undermines self-issued credentials does not exist here.

What EASEC adds

An independent, externally verified competency layer that the delivering institution is structurally unable to provide for itself. These are complementary instruments, not competing ones.

Legal & Technical Architecture

Nine international frameworks. One integrated standard. No proprietary layer in between.

EASEC does not operate within a proprietary framework that exists only within its own ecosystem. Every dimension of the EASEC standard — from competency taxonomy to proficiency levels to credential infrastructure — is anchored in a publicly documented, independently maintained international framework. This is what makes the standard auditable, globally portable and legally defensible.

Documentos Oficiais
ESCO
Taxonomy · v1.2.1
EQF
Níveis 1–8
Europass
EDC · Registered Issuer
eIDAS 2.0
QSeal · EU law
EBSI
Blockchain layer
Tuning
Methodology · Generic Competences
WEF
Future of Jobs · 64+ Countries
UNESCO
Transversal Competencies · SDG 4
1EdTech
Open Badges 3.0 · LTI 1.3
European Commission · v1.2.1

European Skills, Competencies, Qualifications and Occupations

ESCO is the European Commission's multilingual classification of 13,890 skills, competencies, qualifications and occupations — maintained by the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Every one of EASEC's 32 certifiable competencies is mapped to its corresponding ESCO node — with the specific ESCO URI, label and definition documented in the EASEC technical framework. This means that when an employer, university or employment service reads an EASEC credential, they do not need to know EASEC to understand what it certifies. They need to know ESCO — which European HR systems, LinkedIn, EURES and public employment services across the EU already use. The competency language on an EASEC credential is the same language the European labour market already speaks. ESCO alignment is not a badge. It is a taxonomy. And taxonomy is what makes credentials machine-readable, searchable and interpretable across systems — which is precisely what the European Digital Skills Agenda requires of any credential that claims cross-border portability.

Five Credential Formats

Every EASEC certification. Five simultaneous formats. One permanent record.

When an individual meets the certification threshold, five credential formats are issued automatically and simultaneously — covering the full spectrum from formal EU institutional use to global professional portability. No manual steps. No administrative delay. No format hierarchy — all five are equally authentic expressions of the same certified outcome.

Formats issued per certification
5 formats issued simultaneously: Europass EDC, Open Badge 3.0, Digital Diploma, Shareable Digital Credential, Personal EASEC Wallet.
01 Europass EDC
EU Official Format · eIDAS 2.0 QSeal · EDCI Registered

The primary credential format — native to the Europass ecosystem, sealed with a Qualified Electronic Seal under eIDAS 2.0, and deposited directly to the recipient's Europass Wallet. This is the format recognised by EU institutions, universities, public bodies and government authorities across Europe. It is the format referenced in European mobility programmes, qualification recognition processes and public sector procurement. For any use case that requires EU institutional recognition, this is the definitive format.

02 Open Badge 3.0
Global Standard · IMS Global · W3C Verifiable Credential

The global interoperability format — built on the IMS Global Open Badges 3.0 specification and compliant with the W3C Verifiable Credentials data model. Open Badge 3.0 is accepted by any platform, digital wallet or professional network that supports the standard — including LinkedIn, Credly, Badgr and all major HR information systems. This format ensures that the credential is portable beyond the European ecosystem to any professional or institutional context globally.

03 Diploma Digital Co-branded
PDF · Printable · QR + Unique Verification Code

A professionally formatted PDF certificate bearing both the EASEC seal and the issuing institution's or organisation's logo — co-branded as a co-issued credential. Includes a unique alphanumeric verification code and QR code linking directly to the live verification record. Printable for physical display. Designed for institutional communications, portfolio inclusion and formal submission contexts where a visual document is required alongside digital formats.

04 Shareable Digital Credential
LinkedIn · One-click · Publicly Verifiable

A digitally shareable credential format optimised for professional networks — shareable to LinkedIn with one click, visible on the professional's profile as a verified certification, and publicly verifiable by any viewer using the embedded verification link. This format addresses the practical reality of how employers and recruiters encounter credentials — on professional profiles, not in document repositories.

05 EASEC Wallet Pessoal
Permanent · Personal · Institution-Independent

Each certified individual automatically receives a personal EASEC Wallet — a permanent personal account, entirely independent of the issuing institution or organisation. All credentials are accessible, re-downloadable and shareable at any time throughout the individual's career. The wallet persists regardless of whether the individual changes employer, leaves the institution, or the original issuing context ceases to exist. The credential belongs to the individual, permanently.

The Chain of Trust

From assessment to verified credential: the complete chain of trust.

Every EASEC credential is the end point of a documented, auditable chain — from psychometric assessment through competency evaluation to EU-regulated credential issuance. Understanding this chain is what allows quality assurance reviewers, procurement teams and legal advisors to evaluate EASEC with the rigour the decision requires.

Verificar uma Credencial
Item Response Theory · 7 languages

Psychometric Assessment

The individual completes a validated psychometric assessment instrument — built on Item Response Theory (IRT), the methodology used in PISA, professional licensure examinations and clinical assessment internationally. The instrument measures behavioural indicators across the relevant competency or competencies at a specific proficiency level. Assessment is available online in seven languages, with response behaviour monitoring to reinforce evaluation integrity.

Algorithm-based · No evaluator subjectivity

Automated Scoring & Level Determination

Assessment responses are scored automatically against the IRT-calibrated model — producing a proficiency score for each assessed competency and determining the EQF-referenced certification level achieved. Scoring is algorithm-based, eliminating evaluator subjectivity and ensuring consistent, comparable results across individuals, cohorts, geographies and languages.

Pass threshold · Competency profile

Threshold Evaluation

The scored results are evaluated against the certification threshold for the relevant competency and level. Individuals achieving the threshold are certified. Those who do not receive a detailed competency profile showing performance by dimension — useful for targeted development planning, but not issued as a certification.

eIDAS 2.0 QSeal · EBSI anchored

Credential Generation & EU Sealing

Upon certification, all five credential formats are generated automatically. The Europass EDC is sealed with a Qualified Electronic Seal issued by an accredited QTSP — creating a legally attributable, tamper-evident document anchored in the eIDAS 2.0 trust framework. The credential data is simultaneously recorded in the EASEC registry and anchored to EBSI verification infrastructure.

5 formats · No manual processing

Issuance & Delivery

The certified individual receives all five credential formats simultaneously — via email, directly to their personal EASEC Wallet, and, if applicable, co-branded with the institutional or organisational logo of the issuing context. The Europass EDC is deposited to the individual's Europass Wallet. No manual processing. No administrative delay from assessment completion to credential delivery.

cert.easec.eu · Permanent · No login required

Permanent Verification

The credential record is permanently maintained at cert.easec.eu/certificates/verify. Any employer, institution, public authority or individual can verify any EASEC credential in real time using the unique alphanumeric code or QR embedded in the credential — without login, without cost, without contacting EASEC. The record is never deleted, even after the three-year stated validity period of the credential itself.

Operational Standards

ISO 27001. ISO 9001. GDPR. The operational infrastructure behind every credential.

The legal framework of the credential is only as trustworthy as the operational infrastructure behind it. EASEC's assessment platform, data processing systems and credential management infrastructure are certified under internationally recognised operational standards — independently audited, not self-declared.

EASEC's information security management system is certified under ISO 27001 — the international standard for information security, audited by an independent certification body. This means the systems that process assessment data, personal competency profiles and credential records operate under a formally verified security architecture — with documented controls for access management, data protection, incident response and continuous monitoring. For institutions handling sensitive learner data, ISO 27001 certification is the operational standard that makes data processing agreements defensible.
EASEC's quality management processes are certified under ISO 9001 — the international standard for quality management, independently audited. This certification covers the processes by which assessment instruments are developed, validated, updated and administered — ensuring that the quality of the evaluation methodology is subject to systematic review, documented improvement processes and external audit. For quality assurance directors and accreditation reviewers, ISO 9001 certification provides documented evidence of methodological rigour beyond the claims of any marketing material.
All personal data — assessment responses, competency profiles, credential records and individual identifiers — is processed in strict compliance with GDPR and applicable EU data protection law. Data subjects have full rights of access, rectification, erasure and portability under the regulation. Institutional data processing agreements (DPAs) are available for institutions that require documented GDPR compliance as a condition of adoption — standard practice for public universities, government bodies and large employers operating within the EU.
GDPR Data Processing Note for Institutions
Data Processing Agreement available for institutional partnerships

EASEC acts as data processor for learner data submitted by institutions under an institutional agreement. The institution acts as data controller. A formal Data Processing Agreement (DPA) is available upon request and is standard practice for all institutional partnerships.

Request DPA
Practical Implications

What this means for your institution, your quality reviews, and your learners.

Legal and technical architecture matters only insofar as it produces practical outcomes for the institutions and individuals that adopt the standard. Here is what the framework above means in practice — for each of the contexts in which institutions ask us to demonstrate relevance.

QA & Accreditation
Universities · QA reviewers
Procurement & Legal
Procurement · Legal teams
Employers & Recruiters
HR · Talent acquisition
Learners & Professionals
Individuals · Graduates
QA Reviews · Accreditation · ANECA · ENQA

For Quality Assurance Reviews and Accreditation Processes

EASEC accreditation and certification evidence is structured for quality assurance use. Programme alignment documentation maps learning outcomes to ESCO, EQF, Tuning and WEF descriptors in a format that is directly usable in ANECA, ENQA or institutional QA reports — without additional preparation or reformatting. The EASEC Technical Dossier provides the methodological documentation that external review bodies require.

ESCO, EQF and WEF alignment documented at programme and competency level
IRT-validated assessment methodology documented for external review
ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certifications available as operational evidence
Europass issuer registration confirmable via EDCI public registry
WEF Future of Jobs alignment documented at competency level — mappings available in the EASEC Technical Dossier
UNESCO transversal competency concordance documented — cognitive, intrapersonal and interpersonal domains fully covered
Tuning generic competence concordance documented — Intellectual, Work and Social areas mapped to instrumental, interpersonal and systemic competence categories
Procurement · Legal · Compliance

For Procurement and Legal Evaluation

Procurement offices evaluating EASEC as a third-party certification provider have access to the complete technical and legal documentation required for supplier due diligence — including ISO certifications, GDPR Data Processing Agreement template, Europass issuer registration documentation, and the Official Technical Dossier. All documents are freely downloadable from the Official Library without registration.

Formal DPA available — institution as data controller, EASEC as data processor
ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certificates available on request
Europass issuer registration verifiable through the European Commission's EDCI registry
No exclusive contractual lock-in — institutions may adopt EASEC alongside other providers
Employers · HR · Talent Acquisition

For Employer Partners and Graduate Recruiters

Employers encountering EASEC credentials in candidate profiles or graduate submissions can verify any credential in real time at cert.easec.eu/certificates/verify — without contacting EASEC, without creating an account, without cost. The credential displays the certified competencies, proficiency levels, EQF references, ESCO taxonomy nodes, issuing institution and issuance date. Everything needed to evaluate a candidate's independently certified competency profile in under sixty seconds.

Real-time verification — any credential, any time, no login required
ESCO and EQF references — readable by any European HR system or employment platform
Permanent record — verifiable long after the credential's stated validity period
Learners · Professionals · Career Mobility

For Learners and Professionals

Every individual who holds an EASEC credential owns it permanently — independent of the institution that commissioned it, the employer that funded it, or any other third party. The credential is stored in the individual's personal EASEC Wallet and, for Europass EDC format, in their Europass Wallet — accessible and re-downloadable throughout their career. It is portable across borders, sectors and professional contexts — because it is expressed in the taxonomy that European labour markets already use.

Permanent personal ownership — independent of the issuing institution
Portable across 60+ countries in ESCO and Europass ecosystems
Shareable to LinkedIn, Europass, and any Open Badge 3.0 compatible platform
Verifiable by any employer worldwide — no intermediary required
Scope

The honest scope of what EASEC certifies.

Institutional trust is built on precision — not on overclaiming. We state clearly what EASEC is and what it is not, because the distinction is what makes the standard credible to the institutions that adopt it.

EASEC is
An independent psychometric assessment and certification body for transversal competencies
A registered issuer under the Europass Digital Credentials Infrastructure
An ESCO-aligned certification body — all 32 competencies mapped to ESCO v1.2.1 taxonomy
An EQF-referenced certification body — all proficiency levels aligned with EQF descriptors
A WEF Future of Jobs-aligned framework — coverage documented across the 2020, 2023 and 2025 reports
A UNESCO-concordant framework — competency architecture aligned with UNESCO's cognitive, intrapersonal and interpersonal domains
A Tuning-aligned framework — competency areas structured in concordance with Tuning generic competence classification
An Open Badges 3.0 issuer — compliant with the 1EdTech standard and the W3C Verifiable Credentials data model
ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certified in its operational processes
A GDPR-compliant data processor operating under formal institutional DPAs
Active across 64+ countries with 8,000,000+ assessments conducted since 2010
EASEC is not
A government body or a national qualification authority
An academic accreditation body in the formal sense (ANECA, ENQA, ACQUIN, etc.)
An issuer of official EQF level equivalences — that determination belongs to national authorities
A training provider, curriculum designer or learning platform with a stake in programme outcomes
A body that issues academic qualifications — EASEC certifications are competency credentials, not degrees

The correct and legally accurate role of EASEC is that of an independent competency certification body — assessing and certifying what individuals can demonstrably do, under internationally recognised frameworks, with full EU-compliant credential infrastructure. That role is well-defined, well-documented and legally grounded. It is also the role that no academic institution, training provider or employer can occupy for their own learners — which is precisely its value.

FAQ for Institutional Evaluators

Questions from procurement offices, QA teams and legal reviewers.

These are the questions that quality assurance directors, procurement officers and legal teams ask before recommending EASEC to their institution. We answer them with the precision those functions require.

EASEC is a registered issuer under the Europass Digital Credentials Infrastructure (EDCI), operated by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (DG EAC). This registration is verifiable through the EDCI public registry. EASEC is not a governmental body, a national qualification authority, or a formal accreditation agency — it is an independent certification body operating within the EU's digital credential and skills recognition infrastructure. These are distinct roles with distinct legal functions, and EASEC occupies the latter.

No — and this distinction matters legally and institutionally. EASEC certifies the learner's demonstrated competency level within its framework, methodologically aligned with EQF descriptors. An EASEC Level IV certification corresponds to EQF Level 6 descriptors in terms of autonomy, complexity and knowledge integration — but it does not constitute an official EQF level equivalence in the regulatory sense. That determination belongs exclusively to national qualification authorities and to the institutions that formally confer academic qualifications. EASEC provides independently assessed, EQF-referenced competency evidence. That is the correct and legally accurate scope of an independent certification body.

Two independent mechanisms protect the credential's permanence. First, every Europass EDC credential is deposited to the recipient's Europass Wallet — operated by the European Commission, independent of EASEC's systems. Second, EASEC credentials are verifiable through EBSI (European Blockchain Services Infrastructure), the EU's decentralised verification layer, which anchors the credential record independently of any single organisation's infrastructure. In both cases, the credential persists and remains verifiable regardless of any change in EASEC's operational status.

A formal Data Processing Agreement (DPA) is available for all institutional partnerships — establishing EASEC as data processor and the institution as data controller, in compliance with GDPR Article 28. The DPA documents the categories of personal data processed, the purposes of processing, retention periods, sub-processor arrangements, data subject rights procedures, and security measures. The DPA template is available on request from info@easec.eu. Institutions operating under EU public procurement frameworks or with specific national data protection requirements can request a reviewed version of the DPA.

EASEC assessment instruments are validated using Item Response Theory (IRT) — the psychometric methodology used in PISA, professional licensure examinations and clinical psychological assessment internationally. The validation documentation includes item calibration statistics, reliability coefficients, differential item functioning (DIF) analysis across language versions, and proficiency level cut-score justification. The EASEC Psychometric Validation Summary is available in the Official Documents library. The full technical documentation is available to institutional quality assurance teams on request.

Yes — and institutions currently use them in this way. EASEC programme accreditation documentation provides competency alignment evidence structured for quality assurance reporting — mapping programme learning outcomes against ESCO, EQF, Tuning and WEF descriptors in a format directly usable in ANECA, ENQA, ACQUIN or equivalent national QA processes. The documentation does not replace the formal accreditation process, but it provides the independently generated competency alignment evidence that those processes increasingly require.

The credential's portability outside Europe operates through two channels. Open Badge 3.0 — the global open standard for digital credentials — is accepted by any platform, employer or institution that supports the standard, globally. The ESCO taxonomy, on which EASEC competency descriptions are based, is increasingly used by international HR platforms and employment services beyond Europe. For markets where Europass is not directly recognised, the Open Badge 3.0 format and the real-time verification URL provide the practical interoperability that EASEC credentials need to function across geographies.

No — and this distinction matters. WEF and UNESCO are international reference organisations, not accreditation bodies. They publish open frameworks and taxonomies precisely so that educational institutions, certification bodies and employers can map their own systems against them — without issuing endorsements or seals of approval to specific organisations. This is by design: the same way the International System of Units provides a measurement standard without certifying individual instruments, these frameworks provide a reference taxonomy without certifying individual competency systems.

EASEC's relationship with WEF and UNESCO is one of documented alignment — meaning EASEC's competency framework was systematically designed with reference to the definitions, priorities and taxonomies published by these organisations, and every alignment claim is independently verifiable by consulting the public sources cited. This is the same type of relationship that national qualifications frameworks and major professional certification bodies worldwide maintain with these references. The absence of a formal endorsement does not reduce the alignment — it is simply not what these organisations do.

Open Badges 3.0 is the global interoperability standard maintained by 1EdTech (formerly IMS Global). Every EASEC credential is issued simultaneously in Europass EDC format (the EU official format) and Open Badges 3.0 format (the global standard). The Open Badge 3.0 format is accepted by any platform, employer or institution that supports the standard — regardless of geography.

In practical terms: a hiring manager in Singapore, a university in Brazil, or an HR system in the United States that supports Open Badges 3.0 can receive, verify and act on an EASEC credential using the same machine-readable format as a European employer — without needing to know what Europass is. The badge carries all assertion data — issuing organisation, competency certified, proficiency level, issuance date, verification URL — in a standardised format any compliant system can read.

This is why EASEC credentials function in 64+ countries: the Europass format covers European institutional contexts; the Open Badge 3.0 format covers the rest of the world.

There is no minimum volume requirement for Training Accreditation or Programme Accreditation. Skills Certification for employees is available from 250 annual assessments with volume pricing. Professional Certifications are available individually without minimum volume. Institutional partnerships are formalised through an institutional cooperation agreement — which specifies the scope of the partnership, the products adopted, the accreditation or certification duration (1, 2 or 3 years for accreditation), and the relevant data processing arrangements. There is no exclusive arrangement — institutions may adopt EASEC alongside any other certification or accreditation provider.

Documentation for Evaluators

The documentation your evaluation process requires.

Every document cited on this page is freely available from the EASEC Official Library — without registration, without commercial pitch, without follow-up obligation. We make the documentation available because rigorous institutions need to read it before they decide, and because we have nothing to hide from institutions that look closely.

Available for immediate download
Official Technical Dossier
Full legal and technical framework documentation
Psychometric Validation Summary
IRT methodology, reliability data and validation approach
GDPR Data Processing Agreement
Available on request — info@easec.eu
ISO 9001 & ISO 27001 Certifications
Available on request
Europass Issuer Registration
Verifiable via EDCI public registry
Sample Credentials — All Five Formats
Digital Diploma · Europass EDC · Open Badge 3.0 · Digital Credential · EASEC Wallet

The standard is documented. The credentials are verifiable. The conversation is open.

If your institution has reviewed this page and still has questions that the documentation does not answer — on legal framework, on data processing, on methodological validity, or on any other dimension of the standard — we welcome the conversation. No commercial pitch. A structured discussion with the technical and institutional information your evaluation requires.

If you have reviewed the documentation and are ready to discuss implementation, request an institutional demo and we will show you exactly how EASEC applies to your specific institutional context, vertical and objectives.

Any EASEC credential is verifiable in real time — without login, without cost, without contacting EASEC.

cert.easec.eu/certificates/verify